Compare photos by overlapping


model 3 Dual Motor Long Range vs EQC 400 4MATIC




<First car selection>

Tesla

model 3 Dual Motor Long Range 2017- 37474

<Second car selection>

Mercedes-Benz

EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- 57430





Size comparison


A : model 3 Dual Motor Long Range 2017-
B : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-

name length width height
A 4695mm 1850mm 1445mm
B 4770mm 1925mm 1625mm
difference -75mm -75mm -180mm

name weight Minimum turning radius Drive battery capacity
A 1860kg m 75kWh
B 2495kg 5.6m 85kWh
difference -635kg -5.6m -10kWh

name Cargo Volume Drive battery capacity cruising range
A 425L 75kWh 560km
B 500L 85kWh 471km
difference -75L -10kWh +89km


Max output comparison
name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A ---
B ---
difference ---


EV performance comparison
name Electric motor power Electric motor torque
A 330kW 600Nm
B 300kW 760Nm
difference +30kW -160Nm


name Drive battery capacity cruising range Acceleration 0-100km/h
A 75kWh 560km 4.6sec
B 85kWh 471km 5.1sec
difference -10kWh +89km -0.5sec


Tesla model 3 Dual Motor Long Range 2017-
Car manufacturer website
A reasonably priced EV from Tesla. Advanced design that is too simple. EV performance is sufficient even at a slightly affordable price.












Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
Car manufacturer website
The first EV in Mercedes-Benz. The battery capacity is 80kWh, the range is 450km, but it actually has a smaller range, so EQC is likely to be weak on long-distance driving.


Tesla model 3 Dual Motor Long Range 2017-

>>Compare photos by overlapping


new!




SUV   MPV   Hatchback   Wagon   Sedan Coupe
<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top