Compare photos by overlapping


PAJERO Short VRI vs EQC 400 4MATIC




<First car selection>

MITSUBISHI

PAJERO Short VR-I 2006-2019 14435

<Second car selection>

Mercedes-Benz

EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- 58741





Size comparison


A : PAJERO Short VR-I 2006-2019
B : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-

name length width height
A 4385mm 1845mm 1850mm
B 4770mm 1925mm 1625mm
difference -385mm -80mm +225mm

name weight Minimum turning radius Drive battery capacity
A 1940kg 5.3m kWh
B 2495kg 5.6m 85kWh
difference -555kg -0.3m -85kWh

name Cargo Volume Drive battery capacity cruising range
A L kWh km
B 500L 85kWh 471km
difference -500L -85kWh -471km


Max output comparison
name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A 131kW(178PS)261Nm2972cc
B ---
difference ---


EV performance comparison
name Electric motor power Electric motor torque
A kW Nm
B 300kW 760Nm
difference -300kW -760Nm


name Drive battery capacity cruising range Acceleration 0-100km/h
A kWh km sec
B 85kWh 471km 5.1sec
difference -85kWh -471km -5.1sec


MITSUBISHI PAJERO Short VR-I 2006-2019
Car manufacturer website
The short-body, two-door Pajero has a short wheelbase of 2,545 mm and a light weight as a sturdy body, so it can easily run on any rough road.


Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
Car manufacturer website
The first EV in Mercedes-Benz. The battery capacity is 80kWh, the range is 450km, but it actually has a smaller range, so EQC is likely to be weak on long-distance driving.


MITSUBISHI PAJERO Short VR-I 2006-2019

>>Compare photos by overlapping


new!




SUV   MPV   Hatchback   Wagon   Sedan Coupe
<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top