Compare photos by overlapping
CHR HYBRID G vs ECLIPSE CROSS PHEV
＜First car selection＞
TOYOTA
C-HR HYBRID G 2016-
＜Second car selection＞
MITSUBISHI
ECLIPSE CROSS PHEV 2020-
Size comparison
A : C-HR HYBRID G 2016-
B : ECLIPSE CROSS PHEV 2020-
| name | length | width | height |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 4360mm | 1795mm | 1550mm |
| B | 4545mm | 1805mm | 1685mm |
| difference | -185mm | -10mm | -135mm |
| name | weight | Minimum turning radius | Drive battery capacity |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1480kg | 5.2m | 1.31kWh |
| B | 0kg | m | 13.8kWh |
| difference | +1480kg | +5.2m | -12.49kWh |
| name | Cargo Volume | Drive battery capacity | cruising range |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 318L | 1.31kWh | km |
| B | 359L | 13.8kWh | km |
| difference | -41L | -12.49kWh | +0km |
Max output comparison
| name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 72kW(98PS) | 142Nm | 1797cc |
| B | - | - | 2359cc |
| difference | - | - | -562cc |
EV performance comparison
| name | Electric motor power | Electric motor torque | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 53kW | 163Nm | |
| B | kW | Nm | |
| difference | +53kW | +163Nm |
| name | Drive battery capacity | cruising range | Acceleration 0-100km/h |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1.31kWh | km | sec |
| B | 13.8kWh | km | sec |
| difference | -12.49kWh | +0km | +0sec |
TOYOTA C-HR HYBRID G 2016-
Car manufacturer website
Toyota compact SUV. The styling that thoroughly sticks to its appearance makes us feel the new era of SUV.
Car manufacturer website
Mitsubishi Motors' second-generation PHEV SUV. Compared to the Outlander, it has a slightly smaller body, with the same two motors as the Outlander, and a 13.8kWh drive battery, which makes it run lighter. Although it is a state-of-the-art equipment called PHEV, it is a little disappointing that the speedometer is an analog meter, which gives a sense of mismatch.
TOYOTA C-HR HYBRID G 2016-
>>Compare photos by overlapping
new!
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe Order of longest length
Back to top