Compare photos by overlapping


PAJERO ZR vs EQC 400 4MATIC




＜First car selection＞

MITSUBISHI

PAJERO ZR 2006-2019 17650

＜Second car selection＞

Mercedes-Benz

EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- 61419





Size comparison


A : PAJERO ZR 2006-2019
B : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-

name length width height
A 4900mm 1845mm 1870mm
B 4770mm 1925mm 1625mm
difference +130mm -80mm +245mm

name weight Minimum turning radius Drive battery capacity
A 2060kg 5.7m 0kWh
B 2495kg 5.6m 85kWh
difference -435kg +0.1m -85kWh

name Cargo Volume Drive battery capacity cruising range
A L 0kWh km
B 500L 85kWh 471km
difference -500L -85kWh -471km


Max output comparison
name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A 131kW(178PS)261Nm2972cc
B ---
difference ---


EV performance comparison
name Electric motor power Electric motor torque
A kW Nm
B 300kW 760Nm
difference -300kW -760Nm


name Drive battery capacity cruising range Acceleration 0-100km/h
A 0kWh km sec
B 85kWh 471km 5.1sec
difference -85kWh -471km -5.1sec


MITSUBISHI PAJERO ZR 2006-2019
Car manufacturer website
The chassis is a ladder frame built-in monocoque body (the monocoque body is welded to the ladder frame that penetrates the front and back). Although it was proud of high rough road running performance, it was discontinued due to the times.


Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
Car manufacturer website
The first EV in Mercedes-Benz. The battery capacity is 80kWh, the range is 450km, but it actually has a smaller range, so EQC is likely to be weak on long-distance driving.


MITSUBISHI PAJERO ZR 2006-2019

>>Compare photos by overlapping


new!




SUV 　 MPV 　 Hatchback 　 Wagon 　 Sedan Coupe
<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top