Compare photos by overlapping
EQC 400 4MATIC vs PAJERO ZR
＜First car selection＞
Mercedes-Benz
EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
＜Second car selection＞
MITSUBISHI
PAJERO ZR 2006-2019
Size comparison
A : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
B : PAJERO ZR 2006-2019
| name | length | width | height |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 4770mm | 1925mm | 1625mm |
| B | 4900mm | 1845mm | 1870mm |
| difference | -130mm | +80mm | -245mm |
| name | weight | Minimum turning radius | Drive battery capacity |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 2495kg | 5.6m | 85kWh |
| B | 2060kg | 5.7m | 0kWh |
| difference | +435kg | -0.1m | +85kWh |
| name | Cargo Volume | Drive battery capacity | cruising range |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 500L | 85kWh | 471km |
| B | L | 0kWh | km |
| difference | +500L | +85kWh | +471km |
Max output comparison
| name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | - | - | - |
| B | 131kW(178PS) | 261Nm | 2972cc |
| difference | - | - | - |
EV performance comparison
| name | Electric motor power | Electric motor torque | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 300kW | 760Nm | |
| B | kW | Nm | |
| difference | +300kW | +760Nm |
| name | Drive battery capacity | cruising range | Acceleration 0-100km/h |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 85kWh | 471km | 5.1sec |
| B | 0kWh | km | sec |
| difference | +85kWh | +471km | +5.1sec |
Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
Car manufacturer website
The first EV in Mercedes-Benz. The battery capacity is 80kWh, the range is 450km, but it actually has a smaller range, so EQC is likely to be weak on long-distance driving.
Car manufacturer website
The chassis is a ladder frame built-in monocoque body (the monocoque body is welded to the ladder frame that penetrates the front and back). Although it was proud of high rough road running performance, it was discontinued due to the times.
Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
>>Compare photos by overlapping
new!
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe Order of longest length
Back to top