Compare photos by overlapping


EQC 400 4MATIC vs CX4




＜First car selection＞

Mercedes-Benz

EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- 56788

＜Second car selection＞

MAZDA

CX-4 2016- 11918





Size comparison


A : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
B : CX-4 2016-

name length width height
A 4770mm 1925mm 1625mm
B 4633mm 1840mm 1535mm
difference +137mm +85mm +90mm

name weight Minimum turning radius Drive battery capacity
A 2495kg 5.6m 85kWh
B 0kg m kWh
difference +2495kg +5.6m +85kWh

name Cargo Volume Drive battery capacity cruising range
A 500L 85kWh 471km
B L kWh km
difference +500L +85kWh +471km


Max output comparison
name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A ---
B 140kW(190PS)252Nm2488cc
difference ---


EV performance comparison
name Electric motor power Electric motor torque
A 300kW 760Nm
B kW Nm
difference +300kW +760Nm


name Drive battery capacity cruising range Acceleration 0-100km/h
A 85kWh 471km 5.1sec
B kWh km sec
difference +85kWh +471km +5.1sec


Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
Car manufacturer website
The first EV in Mercedes-Benz. The battery capacity is 80kWh, the range is 450km, but it actually has a smaller range, so EQC is likely to be weak on long-distance driving.


MAZDA CX-4 2016-
Car manufacturer website
Mazda SUV sold in China. A model that shares a platform with the CX-5 and has a lower coupe-like styling. If you want a more stylish car that is the size of the CX-5, I would like to choose this CX-4.


Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-

>>Compare photos by overlapping


new!




SUV 　 MPV 　 Hatchback 　 Wagon 　 Sedan Coupe
<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top