Compare photos by overlapping


model 3 Dual Motor Long Range vs ECLIPSE CROSS PHEV




＜First car selection＞

Tesla

model 3 Dual Motor Long Range 2017- 38032

＜Second car selection＞

MITSUBISHI

ECLIPSE CROSS PHEV 2020- 24087





Size comparison


A : model 3 Dual Motor Long Range 2017-
B : ECLIPSE CROSS PHEV 2020-

name length width height
A 4695mm 1850mm 1445mm
B 4545mm 1805mm 1685mm
difference +150mm +45mm -240mm

name weight Minimum turning radius Drive battery capacity
A 1860kg m 75kWh
B 0kg m 13.8kWh
difference +1860kg +0m +61.2kWh

name Cargo Volume Drive battery capacity cruising range
A 425L 75kWh 560km
B 359L 13.8kWh km
difference +66L +61.2kWh +560km


Max output comparison
name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A ---
B --2359cc
difference ---


EV performance comparison
name Electric motor power Electric motor torque
A 330kW 600Nm
B kW Nm
difference +330kW +600Nm


name Drive battery capacity cruising range Acceleration 0-100km/h
A 75kWh 560km 4.6sec
B 13.8kWh km sec
difference +61.2kWh +560km +4.6sec


Tesla model 3 Dual Motor Long Range 2017-
Car manufacturer website
A reasonably priced EV from Tesla. Advanced design that is too simple. EV performance is sufficient even at a slightly affordable price.












MITSUBISHI ECLIPSE CROSS PHEV 2020-
Car manufacturer website
Mitsubishi Motors' second-generation PHEV SUV. Compared to the Outlander, it has a slightly smaller body, with the same two motors as the Outlander, and a 13.8kWh drive battery, which makes it run lighter. Although it is a state-of-the-art equipment called PHEV, it is a little disappointing that the speedometer is an analog meter, which gives a sense of mismatch.






Tesla model 3 Dual Motor Long Range 2017-

>>Compare photos by overlapping


new!




SUV 　 MPV 　 Hatchback 　 Wagon 　 Sedan Coupe
<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top