Compare photos by overlapping
MX30 vs EQC 400 4MATIC
<First car selection>
MAZDA
MX-30 2020- 15781
<Second car selection>
Mercedes-Benz
EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- 57376
Size comparison
A : MX-30 2020-
B : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
name | length | width | height |
---|---|---|---|
A | 4395mm | 1795mm | 1555mm |
B | 4770mm | 1925mm | 1625mm |
difference | -375mm | -130mm | -70mm |
name | weight | wheelbase | Minimum turning radius |
---|---|---|---|
A | 1657kg | 2655mm | m |
B | 2495kg | 2875mm | 5.6m |
difference | -838kg | -220mm | -5.6m |
name | Cargo Volume | seats | minimum ride height |
---|---|---|---|
A | L | 5 | mm |
B | 500L | 5 | 130mm |
difference | -500L | +0 | -130mm |
Max output comparison
A : MX-30 2020-
B : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
---|---|---|---|
A | - | - | - |
B | - | - | - |
difference | - | - | - |
EV performance comparison
name | Electric motor power(F) | Electric motor torque(F) | |
---|---|---|---|
A | 105kW(143PS) | 265Nm | |
B | - | - | |
difference | - | - |
name | Drive battery capacity | cruising range | Acceleration 0-100km/h |
---|---|---|---|
A | 35.5kWh | 200km | 9sec |
B | 85kWh | 471km | 5.1sec |
difference | -49.5kWh | -271km | +3.9sec |
MAZDA MX-30 2020-
15781
Car manufacturer website
Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
57376
Car manufacturer website
The first EV in Mercedes-Benz. The battery capacity is 80kWh, the range is 450km, but it actually has a smaller range, so EQC is likely to be weak on long-distance driving.
MAZDA MX-30 2020-
>>Compare photos by overlapping
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe
Order of longest length
like! | name | length | width | height |
---|---|---|---|---|
32022 | Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 2021- | 4463 | 1834 | 1620 |
14709 | MAZDA MX-30 mild hybrid 2020- | 4395 | 1795 | 1550 |
Back to top