Compare photos by overlapping
MX30 vs EQA 250
＜First car selection＞
MAZDA
MX-30 2020-
＜Second car selection＞
Mercedes-Benz
EQA 250 2021-
Size comparison
A : MX-30 2020-
B : EQA 250 2021-
| name | length | width | height |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 4395mm | 1795mm | 1555mm |
| B | 4463mm | 1834mm | 1620mm |
| difference | -68mm | -39mm | -65mm |
| name | weight | Minimum turning radius | Drive battery capacity |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1657kg | m | 35.5kWh |
| B | 2040kg | m | 79.8kWh |
| difference | -383kg | +0m | -44.3kWh |
| name | Cargo Volume | Drive battery capacity | cruising range |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | L | 35.5kWh | 200km |
| B | 340L | 79.8kWh | 426km |
| difference | -340L | -44.3kWh | -226km |
Max output comparison
| name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | - | - | - |
| B | - | - | - |
| difference | - | - | - |
EV performance comparison
| name | Electric motor power | Electric motor torque | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 105kW | 265Nm | |
| B | 140kW | 375Nm | |
| difference | -35kW | -110Nm |
| name | Drive battery capacity | cruising range | Acceleration 0-100km/h |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 35.5kWh | 200km | 9sec |
| B | 79.8kWh | 426km | 8.9sec |
| difference | -44.3kWh | -226km | +0.1sec |
MAZDA MX-30 2020-
Car manufacturer website
Car manufacturer website
Mercedes-Benz compact SUV EV. The EVs already on the market have EQC, but they are quite large SUVs. On the other hand, EQA is an EV that is a little more affordable and a little more affordable. Although the exterior and interior are similar to GLA, I like the fact that it has an advanced feel as an EV.
MAZDA MX-30 2020-
>>Compare photos by overlapping
new!
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe Order of longest length
Back to top