Compare photos by overlapping
EQC 400 4MATIC vs X5 xDrive 50e M sports
＜First car selection＞
Volks wagen
Audi
Porsche
TOYOTA
LEXUS
MAZDA
NISSAN
MITSUBISHI
Ford
CHEVROLET
Mercedes-Benz
BMW
HONDA
Tesla
VOLVO
Peugeot
CITROEN
DS
LAND ROVER
HYUNDAI
FIAT
JeepMercedes-Benz
EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
59088＜Second car selection＞
BMW
X5 xDrive 50e M sports 2023-
10067Size comparison
A : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
B : X5 xDrive 50e M sports 2023-
| name | length | width | height |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 4770mm | 1925mm | 1625mm |
| B | 4935mm | 2004mm | 1755mm |
| difference | -165mm | -79mm | -130mm |
| name | weight | wheelbase | Minimum turning radius |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 2495kg | 2875mm | 5.6m |
| B | 0kg | 2975mm | m |
| difference | +2495kg | -100mm | +5.6m |
| name | Cargo Volume | seats | minimum ride height |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 500L | 5 | 130mm |
| B | L | mm | |
| difference | +500L | +5 | +130mm |
Max output comparison
A : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
B : X5 xDrive 50e M sports 2023-
| name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | - | - | - |
| B | 230kW(313PS) | 450Nm | 2997cc |
| difference | - | - | - |
EV performance comparison
| name | Drive battery capacity | cruising range | Acceleration 0-100km/h |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 85kWh | 471km | 5.1sec |
| B | 25.7kWh | 110km | 4.8sec |
| difference | +59.3kWh | +361km | +0.3sec |
Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
59088
Car manufacturer website
The first EV in Mercedes-Benz. The battery capacity is 80kWh, the range is 450km, but it actually has a smaller range, so EQC is likely to be weak on long-distance driving.
BMW X5 xDrive 50e M sports 2023-
10067
Car manufacturer website
Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
>>Compare photos by overlapping
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe
Order of longest length
Back to top